Breaking Dawn
Add a Comment
Add Tags
Add More
Save to a List
PrintDetails
- Description
- Full Record
- Author Notes
- Contents
- Excerpts
- Reviews
- Summary
- A\\V Summary
Searching for more content…
In the highly anticipated fourth installment of the Twilight Saga, a marriage, a honeymoon, and the birth of a child bring unforeseen and shocking developments for Bella and Edward and those they love, including new complications with young werewolf Jacob Black.
[disc 2]. Special features.
English or Spanish dialogue; English SDH or Spanish subtitles. Audio description in English for the visually impaired.
Based on the book by Stephanie Meyer.
Special features: 6-part making-of documentary; wedding video; Jacob's destiny; Edward fast forward and Jacob fast forward; audio commentary.
Community Activity
Age
Add Age Suitability
jazzyjazzy thinks this title is suitable for 15 years and over
blue_cat_2032 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 13 and 45
ryansxxemoxxrawr thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 13 and 24
black_nightingale_11 thinks this title is suitable for 17 years and over
KSED2001 thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over
Blue_Dog_130 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 12 and 50
black_swan_49 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 10 and 99
Violet_Dolphin_10 thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over
Videos
Add a Video
Breaking Dawn Part 2 - Teaser Trailer
Get ready for Breaking Dawn Part 2 to be released in theaters November 16, 2012.
Comment
Add a CommentIf you wouldn't want to waste your time watching it, don't waste your time commenting. A movie is a movie and a book is a book, there's no way you can compare both genres
Amazing!
the only i reason i kept watching twilight was because i thought Peter Facinelli (who played the father of the cullens you know the doctor) because i thought he was super hot but other besides that breaking dawn wasnt my favortie
I only watch these movies because I read the books and I want to compare the two. I think they overall did ok. For those who did not read the books probably would not understand half of it. I did not expect much and was pleasantly surprised. The worst one for me was actually the first movie, "Twilight".
This movie was entertaining and interesting but not one of my favorite for this year. “Not too bad---good performance”. "I fast forwarded a lot but not all the way.”
wat r u saying twilight is awesome but the hunger games is better
Ho hum... another boring TWILIGHT movie... I know the series has its avid followers - in a particular age category... but this episodial yawner is such a rip-off flick - that it needs to be said: Boring! Boring!! Boring!!! ...Maybe an added little bit of 21st Century "Rosemary's Baby (with fangs)" might have helped bring some desperately needed viewer-interest to this lame soap-opera... but no such luck, boo hoo!
The other movies were...fluff but fun; I wouldn't tell anyone that was watching them, but they were addictive. This one was embarrassing, I cringed in certain parts, I felt like an idiot to have been duped into watching it.
interesting....... Not THAT bad.....2nd one is probably better than...
Wow. This movie is so lame. What a waste of oxygen.